Why the Working at Heights Regulations should not be repealed this year, or ever.

This blog considers the advantages and challenges associated with the current Working at Height Regulations in the UK, as the government contemplates their continuation or repeal by the end of the year. If no action is taken the regulation will automatically expire on the 31st December 2023, due to the ‘sunset clauses’ within the EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill.

The Work at Height Regulations (WAHR) were established in the UK in 2005 to safeguard workers in sectors such as construction, manufacturing, telecommunications, and maintenance. Although the regulations have undoubtedly enhanced worker safety, they have also encountered criticism from certain voices.

The benefits of the regulations

Improved worker safety - The WAHR provides increased safety for workers carrying out tasks at height, leading to a reduction in accidents and fatalities. Clear guidelines for employers ensure proper planning, supervision, and execution of tasks by competent personnel.

Consistent approach to risk management - The WAHR fosters a uniform approach to risk management across industries. Employers are required to assess risks, implement safety measures, and review risk assessments, ensuring protection for all workers.

Focus on prevention - The regulations emphasize a proactive approach to risk management, requiring employers to avoid the need for work at height whenever possible and use the safest methods and equipment when necessary.

Legal protection for workers - The WAHR enforces legal obligations to protect workers, providing them with a basis for holding employers accountable if they fail to adhere to the regulations, giving workers confidence in their safety.

The claimed problems with the regulations

Increased costs for businesses - Critics argue that the WAHR can impose significant costs on businesses, especially smaller ones with limited resources, due to the need to invest in training, safety equipment, and risk assessments.

Perceived over-regulation - Some contend that the WAHR contributes to over-regulation in the UK, which can stifle innovation and hinder business growth. They argue that the stringent set of requirements can be perceived as bureaucratic and burdensome.

Potential for complacency - The presence of strict regulations may create a false sense of security among workers and employers, leading to complacency and overreliance on the regulations rather than individual responsibility.

Conclusion

The Work at Height Regulations have undoubtedly had a positive impact on worker safety in the UK. Although these regulations may result in increased costs and compliance requirements for businesses, there are cost-effective solutions available in the market, as well as some high-quality specialists who can assist with the need to work at height.

As the UK increasingly turns to high-rise constructions to address the housing shortage, now is not the appropriate time to roll back the progress made.

The need for high-risk work at height primarily arises as architects and clients strive to make sites more commercially viable and sustainable. This is facilitated by advancements in façade and elevator technologies, as well as the growing popularity of urban living, which offers a dense concentration of cultural amenities that appeal to younger generations.

The work at height industry should rise to the challenge set forth by these essential regulations and should not seek to discard them. The adoption of safe practices still has a long way to go, even with the current level of government oversight.